What does the GoGo inflight Wi-Fi look like when leaving CiscoLive2013?

I noticed that my AirTran flight out of Orlando this evening happened to have GoGo Wi-Fi onboard. After hearing several people talk about how great the conference was this year, and that it was better than the last five they had attended, I decided to see how many people on the aircraft were using this service.

Using Fluke’s AirMagnet WiFi Analzyer, I learned a few things:

Three dual band Cisco APs are onboard, using channels 1, 6, 11, 36, 40 & 44. Apparently they’re not using the DFS channels – I wonder why. (okay, I don’t really wonder why)

There’s a Jayhawk (University of Kansas student) onboard, and that person has also been to Livestrong Park in Kansas City for a soccer game:

Looks like we have 30 client devices on the plane also… This is a Boeing 717-200, and since I’m too cheap to pay for Internet access, I will only guess as to how occupants there are on the plane. This flight is probably 90% full, unlike the usual 105% oversold flights I have been on lately. I would not have expected half of the client devices to be on 5GHz, but the packets never lie.

Now here’s something I did not expect to see. Maybe they’re on for a reason?

Here’s the top ten analysis. Not much to see here.

Here’s some good news! They don’t support live video or other streaming technologies. Sorry bandwidthhogs. You know who you are!

One thing I noticed is that they’re not broadcasting two other SSIDs. Anyone know what they’re for? My guess would be for the point of sale and maybe some sort of access for when we’re on the ground.

What is the Internet connection speed is on an airplane traveling 500+ MPH at 30,000+ feet above the earth? I haven’t a clue how they’re accomplishing this? Anyone? Buehler?

I looked around the aircraft, trying NOT to look suspicious, attempting to find the three access points – but never did. Must be tucked away somewhere behind all of that plastic…

At least we have equal distribution of client devices. I can only assume that is because the devices are turned off for takeoff and landing, so we don’t get the “front door effect”, where devices associate to the AP at the place of entry and stick to that AP for the entire time.

How much does it cost? The first time I looked, it was 3 dollars for 30 minutes. Then I looked again and it was $4.50 for three minutes. Either that, or I’m seeing things. It has been a long day…

Thanks for making it this far!

Comments

Build your own Ekahau ePerf & Speedtest.mini server!

One a recent forklift project, we decided to replace our aging 802.11a/g hardware and deploy new 802.11ac WLAN gear. We designed the building with Ekahau’s ESS - our default WLAN survey and design tool. After designing the WLAN to meet our healthcare requirement (in this case, Aeroscout tags, Vocera badges, 5GHz Voice and data) we installed the gear and then validated the WLAN. For this initial 802.11ac deployment, we decided to do both passive and throughput validations. With throughput surveys, we measure actual data, such as packet loss and jitter. On a side note - for some time now, we have said to ourselves, “I wish we had a portable Ookla Speedtest server”. Spoiler alert! We needed a throughput server that would be both simple to use and portable. After talking with our Ekahau team, we decided to use the Odroid C2, and configure it for two purposes. (It turns out that Ekahau has done the homewor...

Easy way to mount a Cisco 3602 or 3702 to the wall with off the shelf materials

Here is an option on how to Cisco AIR-CAP3602I-A-K9 access point to a wall from materials you can easily purchase from Home Depot. (ie, I have done all the homework already) All for under six dollars. Check out last screen capture for the receipt. The access point was designed to be ceiling mounted in carpeted office environments, ten feet above the finished floor. That said, there are areas that we to provide Wi-Fi coverage to that do not fit the above mentioned description – such as manufacturing, warehouses and older buildings. In these cases, we have nowhere to mount the access point. Ceilings may be 30 feet, which is not where we want to install the AP. In these cases we need to install the AP on a wall, approximately ten feet above the floor. The AP does not come with a wall mount bracket that will mount it parallel to the floor, so I have come up with an off-the-shelf solution from Home Depot. The two things from the hardware sectio...

Aligning a P2P Wi-Fi bridge link

I was recently called out to investigate a Wi-Fi bridge link that was being accused of being the culprit of a myriad of network problems. Upon arrival on site, I noticed that the main site’s Wi-Fi bridge was sitting on channel 161, and that channel was overpopulated since there were two access points in the building, both on channel 161. I moved the building’s access points to the UNII-1 band, and changed the bridge’s channel to help alleviate some of the congestion since there was another access point on that channel across the street. These three screenshots are before I made any changes: Note that the bridge is capable of achieving a 54 mb/s data rate, however only 3% of all the packets are traveling at that rate – and 92% of them are data packets. The busiest data rate is the lowest data rate – with 72% of the traffic at that rate. Hmmm…. Also, a quick screenshot as a baseline.. After coming up with a cha...

Handcrafted Wi-Fi

Search This Blog